Showing posts with label Peter Mackay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Mackay. Show all posts

Friday, April 20, 2012

Peter Mackay: Besides F-35 another $2 billion bungling


Defence minister Peter MacKay is taking the heat for the shortcomings of the F-35 project in public, yet he is no longer in control of the process. Chris Wattie/Reuters

This one is about infantry fighting vehicles.

“It is understood that the $2-billion competition to chose (sic) a supplier for up to 138 armoured infantry fighting vehicles may have to start all over again after the Department of Public Works intervened in the tender process.”

Read more here.

Recommend this post

Sunday, April 08, 2012

Peter MacKay: F-35 Purchase Fiasco

Rex Murphy once in a while gives great commentary. This is one of those commentaries. Peter Mackay an Honoury Defence Minister or not so honoury.



"Is anyone in charge? Or is Peter MacKay a kind of honorary Defence Minister?" Murphy asks. "A real minister would resign after this week's sad comedy."

Recommend this post

Monday, March 26, 2012

General Walter Natynczyk and Peter MacKay



From the Toronto Star: “….the Conservative government was behind a plot to damage his reputation when reports emerged last fall that he had used a Challenger jet to join his family on a Caribbean cruise, the Toronto Star has learned.”

Now this General is complaining that it was the Conservative government who leaked the information that he used a Challenger jet to join his family on a Caribbean cruise. That Conservatives did this to discredit him. It is surprising why the Harper government will try to embarrass and discredit a military general. Is it possible they want to denigrate Peter MacKay, claiming he has no control over his generals as Minister of Defence?

And remember, Peter MacKay was accused of something similar - using military equipment - regarding his use of a helicopter.

Also, is it possible that Harper feels threatened by Peter MacKay and wants to marginalize him and push him out?

When Harper formed his first minority government, they gave MacKay one of the most difficult portfolios, Foreign Affairs, perhaps hoping that the Afghanistan fiasco would somehow cause problems for MacKay and bring him down.

When that didn't happen, Harper directly gave him the portfolio of Defence, still hoping that MacKay would make missteps or, if things go wrong in Afghanistan, MacKay could be the scapegoat, thereby pushing him out.

I am no fan of Peter MacKay, especially as when he became leader of the Progressive Conservatives, he wasted no time to join Reform to form a new conservative party. This he did despite giving his word to David Orchard that he would do no such thing in exchange for his support in the Progressive Conservative leadership race.

This, I believe, considerably hurt MacKay's credibility.

However, I must say, that after he joined the conservative party, I saw some correspondence with Peter MacKay, where he came across as very personable and approachable. I heard anyone he ever corresponded with, he felt the need to explain why he went for merger. He felt obligated to do so. In other words he expressed his remorse to his supporters but indicated that it was good for the party and the country.

Now there seems to be a struggle between Harper and MacKay, where it is going to lead we don't know. One thing is for sure though, it's going to hurt Canadians, and cause many problems as far as our foreign policy and defence is concerned.

All Stephen Harper cares for is to be Prime Minister. What happens to the country, what happens to Canadians, what happens to our country's reputation, seems to be none of Harper's concern.

Should such a person remain in power? I wish there was an impeachment process like in the United States so we can get rid of this moron Harper. I also hope that the robo-calls fiasco will bring Harper down, because robo-calling looks to have helped Harper win the election.

One can only hope the best for our country.

Recommend this post

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Peter MacKay is on a jet

It is only taxpayers’ money – the suckers. A billion here and a billion there what is the big deal. $1.2 billion for G8 and G20 and now $9 billion for F-35. Just buy those damn jets. No bidding or competition needed. It is just the taxpayers’ money – the suckers.
Peter MacKay says we must support the soldiers. Yeah! Peter it is not your butt which is in the harm’s way. Why not support the soldiers and bring them home. Why are we getting them killed in Afghanistan? And those who survive have battle scars and PTSD. The suicide rate amongst the soldiers is very high. 32 US soldiers committed suicide in June alone. I believe that is more than killed in the war theatre in the month of June. So Peter Mackay you are trying to fool the public as usual.


Recommend this post

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Stephen Harper and his Private Eye

Ahmadshah Malgarai (aka Pasha) is an Afghani translator for the Canadian military who currently lives in Canada. More recently he testified before a Parliamentary Committee and gave details of the torture of Afghan detainees stating that Canadian officials and military brass had the full knowledge of it and if the generals say they did not know about it then they are lying. If Peter Mackay says he did not know about it then he is lying.

He also said that an innocent young Afghan man was shot in the head by Canadian soldiers and then efforts were made to cover up this incident. Maybe Pasha will be next on Harper's hit list as he is embarrassing to his government. Will Harper deport him? Pasha also said that his family has been threatened by Taliban and government officials are not helping him to bring his family to Canada.

Read the full story of Pash here.

Recommend this post

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Three stooges reminiscing on the Parliament Hill



Harper, Mackay and Hillier vehemently deny that there was any torture of Afghan detainees. Harper and Mackay made public statements and Hillier appeared before the Special Committee of the Parliament on Afghanistan Mission.

In other words, according to them, Richard Colvin is not telling the truth. According to them, the Human Rights Commission of Afghanistan is lying – the same commission which the Harper government has extolled in the past. The Red Cross is exaggerating and lying. Other diplomats who spoke out are lying. Media, especially reporters in Afghanistan, some of whom were embedded with Canadian forces, are lying; but these three and some other generals are telling the truth. If you believe these three under the circumstance then I have Rideau Canal for sale.

Recommend this post

Monday, November 23, 2009

Peter Mackay: Writing is on the Wall

Peter Mackay keeps saying that allegations that Afghan detainees handed over to Afghans were tortured cannot be substantiated by facts. What facts? Would he care to elaborate?

Peter, for Pete sake, the writing is on the wall. Your own senior diplomat is saying it happened. His fellow diplomats here in Canada and Europe are backing him up. Media in Canada and Britain are saying that this is the case. Even a very right leaning paper, the National Post, is saying that there is a problem, they had an editorial siding with Mr. Colvin.

Peter, have you learned nothing from Maher Arar's case who was detained in the U.S? Our law enforcement agencies provided unsubstantiated information about him, and he was sent to Syria where he was tortured. Canada got a black eye for that and settled for millions of dollars with Mr. Arar. When will you learn? Do yourself a favour and resign, as the defence portfolio is not your cup of tea.

Recommend this post

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Peter Mackay’s facts

According to Defence Minister Peter Mackay, Richard Colvin's statements cannot be backed by facts. Which facts is Mackay talking about? Why does he not state these facts?

What possibly can be the motive of Richard Colvin to lie? To get fired from a high profile, well paid job in Washington D.C? Although Peter Mackay says he will not fire him and he will leave it up to to the civil servants. Right! He is really telling the truth now, is he not. My golly what a yahoo Mackay is; he really thinks people will believe him, Mackay, who wants to keep his job and that of his boss Harper's and will do anything for it; or would people believe Calvin who apparently has no motives (other than self-destruction?) as in the long run his career may be ruined.

Here is Mackay's statement:

"I don't believe it's credible. I don't believe it's backed up by fact and what we have to deal with in a parliamentary hearing, as we do in a court of law, or another judicial or public inquiry, is evidence that can be substantiated."


You can click here to read the rest of the story.

Recommend this post

Friday, November 20, 2009

Stephen Harper: Emperor Without Clothes

It is amazing that Stephen Harper, Peter Mackay and Rick Hillier all either have amnesia or don't recall (typical excuse in order to hide the truth) receiving any memo from Richard Colvin, a senior Canadian diplomat in Afghanistan now posted in the US. In these memos, it was stated that detainees handed over by Canadian troops to Afghan authorities were routinely tortured. How can they not know? They have lost any credibility, not that they had any. It does not look good on Canada. We wittingly or unwittingly were party to war crimes. How can we condemn Rwanda or other similar war atrocities by other societies when we ourselves were heavily involved? Very sad times for Canada.

Recommend this post

Saturday, November 07, 2009

Peter MacKay Engaged

Not in the war this time or maybe. He is engaged to Jana Juginovic of CTV. Poor Condi.

Recommend this post

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Peter Mackay, Peter Pan or Ali Baba

Harper and partners have been telling us a story from the Arabian Nights - ie. Ali Baba and the 40 thieves plus magic lamp. We were told in 2006 by Harper that we were winning in Afghanistan. That how important the mission was and that you were either with him or with the Taliban. My oh my times change. Now we hear of negotiation with the Taliban and that we can try and contain the insurgency but there is no such thing as winning. Yes we lost the lives of over 100 soldiers but someone please tell me what are our gains.

In last few days Peter Mackay - or Peter Pan or, even more appropriately, Ali Baba - has dropped by in Afghanistan. Now he knows that victory was always elusive and he started talking about rebuilding and reconstruction of Afghanistan. Then he tells us that for reconstruction why there should be a time limit when we can do it indefinitely. What a balderdash. C'mon, why not admit that our mission is a failure and soldiers' lives were lost, and alot of taxpayers money was spent for what goal to be achieved. Ali Baba and the 40 thieves plot intensifies.

Recommend this post

Saturday, February 09, 2008

Carla Bruni and Nicolas Sarkozy: Peter MacKay Seeking NATO Help

Will Sarkozy, President of France, provide troops for Afghanistan? He has his own pre-occupations... he is totally submerged in the love of his new wife, Carla Bruni.

Recommend this post